🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a fundamental right. Instead, it has become a privilege that those in power grant or deny at their discretion. This represents the underlying meaning of new regulations that the ruling administration is putting forward, which would determine the timing and location protests can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who disobey these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Civil Liberties

Previous governments had already undermined this essential right: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement extensive new authorities, which global rights bodies had condemned as "serious and unjustified restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these incremental attacks on liberty have effectively eliminated the hard-won right to freedom of protest.

Using Atrocity to Rationalize Suppression

The most recent limitations are being defended by citing last week's terrible antisemitic attack on a British mosque. We can all agree on universal agreement that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, employing this horrific incident as a justification to suppress dissent is not only unrelated to that duty but distorts it.

"If you can't draw the line at mass killing, you probably can't establish limits at democratic principles," commented a prominent American author, a statement that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Reflect on Britain's rich history of public demonstration and activism against racism and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were branded as extremists in their era, even while they were advocating the freedoms of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In the current complex situation, here's what's actually happening: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have described as systematic destruction. Its warfare have prompted the global justice body to release legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his ex-military leader.

International public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of citizens believe Israel has probably committed war crimes. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on weapons exports to the nation, and approve the detention of Netanyahu.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially lost the public debate, Israel's supporters are now seizing on a despicable antisemitic crime to attempt to suppress a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be included in this attempt. Ministers have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to intervene.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish heritage with the actions of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also harmful. The official definition of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a situation where police authorities can propose that demonstrations opposing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "accidentally or intentionally" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have stated that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made political parties "implicated" in alleged abuse faced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the very day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from two years of daily atrocities that have taken tens of thousands of human lives. British politicians and news organizations have barely concealed the minimal importance they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of racism in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a concerning threshold by proscribing Palestine Action, a non-violent, human rights-focused activist collective. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, mostly for carrying placards against mass killing and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; including a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader implied that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president described such protests as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the repressive measures on such protests – and on freedom of expression in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to suppress dissent. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors fought, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to secure our freedoms. We may ultimately regret how easily we permitted them to be eroded.