🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.