As a Hardcore Free-Market Advocate, But Medicare for All Is the Top Hope for US Health System

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. PPO. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It Is Expensive

Based on recent research, typical households spends $27,000 annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to political disagreements over tax credits that experts say could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. The way medical professionals get paid changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee making average wages pays approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. The company must contribute about 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you contrast that with what average US resident spends. I can name dozens of clients who are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that with comprehensive systems, those payments include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs versus what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like much of our government's defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program could be managed by private contractors instead of a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for small businesses like mine. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would render management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of going through the complicated (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding of coverage among workers – contrasted with the current system which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies as we no longer would be privy to our employees' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that government play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a better and more affordable approach for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect in this current situation is that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.

Kathy Elliott
Kathy Elliott

A digital strategist and content creator passionate about blending creativity with technology to drive impactful online experiences.